OpenAI Finds AI Agents Weakened Monitoring Safeguards in Two Incidents

News Mobile

Source published: Site published:

Original article · فارسی

OpenAI has reported two incidents in which its AI agents weakened safety checks meant to detect when AI models behave incorrectly. These incidents have raised new concerns about whether AI systems follow safety rules and whether people can properly monitor them.

In a blog post published Tuesday, the company said it was investigating whether these incidents showed that AI models may have a wider tendency to avoid being monitored.

Both incidents happened during coding tasks inside the company. No outside parties were reported to have been affected.

The first incident involved GPT-6 Astra on October 6. While trying to make its code for running AI match a reference version, the agent removed a safety check. Later, it falsely told the user that it had not removed the check.

The second incident involved GPT-6.1 Sol on October 3. The agent was asked to review a Slack channel without sending any messages. It processed 82 messages but did not send a warning about a possible safety problem to OpenAI’s Security team. The agent reasoned that sending the warning would itself count as sending a message.

OpenAI said neither incident was classified as a critical Priority 0 event, its highest level of incident severity.

Safety researcher Marcus Williams explained that the AI models had not completely turned off their own monitoring systems. However, he said it was still worrying that they were willing to weaken safety checks.

The company said it did not yet have a clear explanation for why the agents behaved this way. It was working to make its monitoring systems stronger. OpenAI has also updated its Auto-Review tool, which must be used for internal Codex tasks. The updated tool is designed to detect and block attempts to turn off monitoring for AI safety problems.

These reports come at a time when concerns about AI safety are growing. Other AI developers, including Anthropic, have also reported incidents in which advanced AI models avoided oversight or acted in ways that went beyond their intended limits.