Scientists call for international body to oversee advanced AI
Synopsis
In a groundbreaking initiative, approximately 400 scientists, including specialists in AI, are advocating for the establishment of an international regulatory body for AI systems. They recommend that advanced AI technologies remain air-gapped and be monitored independently, aiming to strengthen AI safety following recent vulnerabilities. This movement is gaining traction among policymakers worldwide, emphasizing the need for stringent containment standards and formal regulation in AI development.
Listen to this article in summarized format
ReutersAround 400 scientists, including AI pioneers Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, on Tuesday called for an international body to oversee containment standards and incident reporting for advanced cyber-capable AI systems.
The proposed body would set industry-wide containment standards and maintain a registry of significant security incidents, which the scientists said should eventually be made public.
In an open letter, the researchers said frontier AI models should initially be air-gapped from external networks and subject to independent oversight, arguing that voluntary industry commitments are not enough.
The proposal comes a month after Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, xAI and Nvidia signed a White House accord committing to voluntary safety measures without any formal enforcement mechanism.
The letter also follows a series of incidents that researchers say exposed weaknesses in how advanced AI systems are tested and contained, including cases where AI models bypassed insufficiently sandboxed environments and compromised external systems.
The signatories from 34 countries said organisations developing or testing cyber-capable models should immediately adopt high-assurance containment standards while governments work towards a more formal oversight regime.
Policymakers are increasingly debating how advanced AI systems should be supervised. EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen told Reuters on Friday that the bloc's AI Act is sufficient to address risks from rogue AI systems.
On Sunday, the Trump administration lifted its block on US labs giving Britain's AI Security Institute early access to models for safety testing.
Hinton and Bengio shared the 2018 Turing Award with Meta's Yann LeCun, another leading AI researcher. LeCun did not sign the letter and has argued that recent security incidents primarily reflect engineering failures rather than existential AI risks.
The proposed body would set industry-wide containment standards and maintain a registry of significant security incidents, which the scientists said should eventually be made public.
In an open letter, the researchers said frontier AI models should initially be air-gapped from external networks and subject to independent oversight, arguing that voluntary industry commitments are not enough.
The proposal comes a month after Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, xAI and Nvidia signed a White House accord committing to voluntary safety measures without any formal enforcement mechanism.
The letter also follows a series of incidents that researchers say exposed weaknesses in how advanced AI systems are tested and contained, including cases where AI models bypassed insufficiently sandboxed environments and compromised external systems.
The signatories from 34 countries said organisations developing or testing cyber-capable models should immediately adopt high-assurance containment standards while governments work towards a more formal oversight regime.
Policymakers are increasingly debating how advanced AI systems should be supervised. EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen told Reuters on Friday that the bloc's AI Act is sufficient to address risks from rogue AI systems.
On Sunday, the Trump administration lifted its block on US labs giving Britain's AI Security Institute early access to models for safety testing.
Hinton and Bengio shared the 2018 Turing Award with Meta's Yann LeCun, another leading AI researcher. LeCun did not sign the letter and has argued that recent security incidents primarily reflect engineering failures rather than existential AI risks.
Add
as a Reliable and Trusted News Source
Read more news on
(Catch all the Technology News News, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
...more
Add Comment
Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea.
Curbing rupee bets: What the RBI’s new rules mean for the hedge-now-or-wait question Brinjal, buffalo, bacteria: Inside India’s pay-for-nature system Homebuyers wait as NCLT panel picks holes in unfinished Jaypee projects The NBFC saga - Part 3: How one default in 2018 changed the way RBI reads risk Four rules made HDFC Bank a compounder. All four have stopped. Can the new CEO rewrite them? What is the real impact of 13x jump in cash transfers to women? The NBFC saga - Part 2: Line drawn in 2006 is reason for the headlines today Airlines Q2 turbulence: Fewer passengers, rising fares and a crude shock Britannia’s next big bet for young India lies beyond biscuits The world is witnessing a bond rout. Why should it matter to you?
Subscribe Now










