Why AI makes computer worms harder to stop
Synopsis
Anthropic's warning that AI-powered "worms" could soon spread across smart gadgets is the latest in a series of studies showing how artificial intelligence could supercharge self-spreading malware. A computer worm is malicious software that spreads between devices on its own.
Listen to this article in summarized format
ReutersAnthropic's warning that AI-powered "worms" could soon spread across smart gadgets is the latest in a series of studies showing how artificial intelligence could supercharge self-spreading malware.
A computer worm is malicious software that spreads between devices on its own.
In June, Nicolas Papernot, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Toronto, led a team that built a prototype AI worm using freely available AI models.
Papernot, who has signed an open letter with recommendations for policymakers, spoke to AFP about why AI makes these attacks harder to stop.
The interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Q: How is AI changing these types of attacks?
A: The reality is that a lot of these "IoT" (Internet of Things or connected home) devices have very poor cybersecurity hygiene, and so they are very easy targets for bad actors to compromise.
Historically, a worm would exploit a fixed set of vulnerabilities, and that meant you could fix these vulnerabilities and prevent the worm from propagating any further to devices that had been updated.
Now, with AI, an attacker can design a worm that tailors the attack strategy to that device's specifics and these vulnerabilities can be different.
This makes it significantly harder to interrupt the propagation of an AI-driven computer worm, because you have to anticipate all the possible vulnerabilities the devices might present.
Some of these vulnerabilities are not software bugs.
They can also be misconfigurations -- for instance, if someone has used the same password for multiple services, or hasn't configured a database properly.
What AI-driven malware does is accelerate the pace at which these vulnerabilities are exploited and the scale.
In the past, your corner coffee shop, or the laptop in your basement that you use very rarely, might not be up to date, but it wouldn't be targeted by a human attacker, because they don't have the resources and the time to do that.
Now, the autonomy gained by using AI means that all these devices that are less immediate targets become interesting targets as a launchpad to attack more interesting targets.
But we have to keep in mind that a human is launching an agent.
Once launched, the agent can replicate, as we showed in our work, but it is launched by a human.
Q: What can we do to mitigate the risks?
A: We won't bring the risk to zero and we have to realize that, despite the fact that some of these vulnerability fixes are available, people don't update their devices or don't apply the fixes in a timely manner.
Despite cybersecurity experts calling for increased cybersecurity for decades, we still live in a world where a lot more can be invested in improving the security of our computer systems.
There are really three things we recommend in the very short term.
The first is to change development and testing practices to ensure that AI models are initially disconnected from the internet, as a precaution, to understand their behavior better before we expose critical infrastructure on the internet [to them].
The second recommendation is to create an international body to standardize both how we train and how we contain AI models. Both are important. We want to train models that are safer.
The last part is about making reporting of security incidents mandatory. Right now, we are only getting information as a function of what AI developers are willing to release, and that's a big problem.
In particular, the academic community needs a lot more information about incidents to be able to develop countermeasures much more quickly.
Otherwise, we have to do a lot of research on understanding the threat first, before we can develop the countermeasures. Otherwise we won't see what bad actors are doing until an attack is launched.
A computer worm is malicious software that spreads between devices on its own.
In June, Nicolas Papernot, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Toronto, led a team that built a prototype AI worm using freely available AI models.
Papernot, who has signed an open letter with recommendations for policymakers, spoke to AFP about why AI makes these attacks harder to stop.
The interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Q: How is AI changing these types of attacks?
A: The reality is that a lot of these "IoT" (Internet of Things or connected home) devices have very poor cybersecurity hygiene, and so they are very easy targets for bad actors to compromise.
Historically, a worm would exploit a fixed set of vulnerabilities, and that meant you could fix these vulnerabilities and prevent the worm from propagating any further to devices that had been updated.
Now, with AI, an attacker can design a worm that tailors the attack strategy to that device's specifics and these vulnerabilities can be different.
This makes it significantly harder to interrupt the propagation of an AI-driven computer worm, because you have to anticipate all the possible vulnerabilities the devices might present.
Some of these vulnerabilities are not software bugs.
They can also be misconfigurations -- for instance, if someone has used the same password for multiple services, or hasn't configured a database properly.
What AI-driven malware does is accelerate the pace at which these vulnerabilities are exploited and the scale.
In the past, your corner coffee shop, or the laptop in your basement that you use very rarely, might not be up to date, but it wouldn't be targeted by a human attacker, because they don't have the resources and the time to do that.
Now, the autonomy gained by using AI means that all these devices that are less immediate targets become interesting targets as a launchpad to attack more interesting targets.
But we have to keep in mind that a human is launching an agent.
Once launched, the agent can replicate, as we showed in our work, but it is launched by a human.
Q: What can we do to mitigate the risks?
A: We won't bring the risk to zero and we have to realize that, despite the fact that some of these vulnerability fixes are available, people don't update their devices or don't apply the fixes in a timely manner.
Despite cybersecurity experts calling for increased cybersecurity for decades, we still live in a world where a lot more can be invested in improving the security of our computer systems.
There are really three things we recommend in the very short term.
The first is to change development and testing practices to ensure that AI models are initially disconnected from the internet, as a precaution, to understand their behavior better before we expose critical infrastructure on the internet [to them].
The second recommendation is to create an international body to standardize both how we train and how we contain AI models. Both are important. We want to train models that are safer.
The last part is about making reporting of security incidents mandatory. Right now, we are only getting information as a function of what AI developers are willing to release, and that's a big problem.
In particular, the academic community needs a lot more information about incidents to be able to develop countermeasures much more quickly.
Otherwise, we have to do a lot of research on understanding the threat first, before we can develop the countermeasures. Otherwise we won't see what bad actors are doing until an attack is launched.
Add
as a Reliable and Trusted News Source
Read more news on
(Catch all the Technology News News, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
...more
A Billionaire's Reading List: 5 Books Cuban Says Everyone Should KnowCuban reads for three hours every morning. This is the exact list he recommends — and there's a faster way to absorb every idea on it without clearing your calendar.Blinkist Magazine
Undo
It's Not Salt: Doctors Now Tie High Blood Pressure to a Drink Most Seniors Have before 8AMThe Vitality Knowledge House
Undo
Gold Investors Are Watching the Wrong Metal — Here’s What Historically Moves NextWeiss Ratings
Learn More
Undo
A Billionaire's Reading List: The 5 Books Cuban Says Everyone Should KnowCuban reads for three hours every morning. This is the exact list he recommends — and there's a faster way to absorb every idea on it without clearing your calendar.Blinkist Magazine
Undo
Spinal Stenosis Isn't An Age Problem — The Real Cause May Surprise You(Stop Doing This)Smoothspine
Learn More
Undo
Walgreens Hides This 87¢ Generic Viagra In Aisle 5 - Men Over 50 Found It AnywayFriday Plans
Learn More
Undo
Add Comment
Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea.
Onion inflation at 108%? Yes, but not really. What is different this time? Curbing rupee bets: What the RBI’s new rules mean for the hedge-now-or-wait question Brinjal, buffalo, bacteria: Inside India’s pay-for-nature system Homebuyers wait as NCLT panel picks holes in unfinished Jaypee projects The NBFC saga - Part 3: How one default in 2018 changed the way RBI reads risk Four rules made HDFC Bank a compounder. All four have stopped. Can the new CEO rewrite them? What is the real impact of 13x jump in cash transfers to women? The NBFC saga - Part 2: Line drawn in 2006 is reason for the headlines today Airlines Q2 turbulence: Fewer passengers, rising fares and a crude shock Britannia’s next big bet for young India lies beyond biscuits
Subscribe Now










